|
*scribblings from my mental scratchpad*
time, and all else on its path
by: Marx Vergel Melencio
- there are now, 'caused by Einstein's 'Special and General Theory of Relativity', five dimensions in which all particles, so the entirety of the universe itself, operate: length; width; height; the curved platform in which the three prior coordinates operate; and time - in which the latter dimension, that of time, bounds and is also bounded by all prior dimensions (that of length, width, height, and the curvature of the platform in which such three prior coordinates operate)...
so, equated as such, time would always be equivalent to space - they are of the same coin, but represents each opposing side... therefore, time, and conversely space, between two certain points, can be measured by each other...
ie. the time it would take for a particle starting from a certain point to a specified point is equivalent to the space between the two points, which the particle in motion with a certain critical speed would have to tread in order to reach the destination point from its point of origin, and conversely, the space between such two points is equivalent to the time it would take for a moving particle with a certain critical speed to go from one point to the other...
therefore, theoretically, if one has an equipment to map the positions, velocities, and paths, (though the point being to map all such variables in the most accurate way possible and not to involve accuracy rates of 100%, for it was known from the emergence of Heisenberg's 'Principle of Uncertainty' that the more you try to accurately measure variables of a particles single specific physical property, the more discrepancies emerge in measuring every variable of all its other physical properties, specifically: the more you try to accurately measure a particle's motion, in terms of its speed or velocity, its position changes, and, the more you try to accurately measure a particle's position, its velocity or speed changes - for all particles within the universe are in motion, 'cause it is an expanding, thus moving, universe), of all the particles in a given area, the person would then just have to either magnetize such particles to their prior positions, or demagnetize them to their most probable 'future' positions, in order to either reverse or fast-track 'imaginary time' operating within the specified area (for time is always only imaginary, and most people's current concept of time would not be reversed nor fast-tracked, but the events within the imaginary time-frame - within the space-frame would be more precise... note: even all brain activities of all living entities within or contained by this universe involve electrical impulses from chemical, mechanical and electrical stimulation, which, again, come from sensory inputs all brought about by particle-interactions, and everything, even such particle-interactions, electrical impulses, chemical, mechanical and electrical stimulation are composed of particles and result from particle-interactions which give-off force-carrying particles...)... of course, such a person should also have an equipment capable of magnetizing and demagnetizing every particle - I could only think of the unification of gravitational force, in which is operated by particles known as gravitons, whose main properties are such force is always attractive and never repellant, and it affects all particles, and that of electromagnetic, or even separated as electrical and magnetic, force or forces, in which is operated by particles known as protons and electrons (neutrons only belong to the category of weak nuclear force, though all three belong to the category of weak nuclear force, and the former two belong to the category of strong nuclear force, which would also be good if one could unify such five - electrical; magnetic; gravitational; weak nuclear; and strong nuclear - forces, and not just the three - electrical and magnetic forces have long been unified... - I have stated prior to this) - scientists at CERN have been working on what they call the 'Grand Unification Theory' (GUT), and would perhaps do just so in a matter of 'imaginary time', though I hope and am confident that they would do so as soon as possible) - , whose main properties are that they are repellant to some particles and attractive, again, to some particles as well... so, when unified, such would be enough of a single force in which to functionally control the magnetization and demagnetization of every particle.
*note on this: the functional unification of the five elemental forces have been claimed to be achieved, with experimental visual evidence in the form of a video, by the physicist John Nordberg, whom had given this for its equation:
the vector of the electrical field crossed with the vector of the magnetic field is equivalent to the vector of the gravitational field,
in which the weak and strong nuclear forces could be derived from the said equation...
- the vector of the electrical field crossed, and not multiplied, with the vector of the magnetic field produces the vector of the gravitational field, and understanding of the said equation needs substantial knowledge on higher physics and higher mathematics, specifically the mathematics and physics behind spherical particle motion, and not just the understanding of the mathematics and physics behind wave particle motion, for the term to cross is the cross product, which in physics is a way of mathematically and geometrically multiplying vectors...;
- the equation does not contain basic operations utilized by mathematics in physics, for, in the basic operations of mathematics in physics, the variables have arrows on top of them, and such arrows are physics symbols for "vectors", which in physics is a quantity that has both magnitude and direction, and this gravitational field vector is different from the traditional symbols found in physics, specifically gravity, represented by the small "g" (not a vector)
and the gravitational field constant represented by a plain big "G";
- in our present physics, when you pass an electrical current on the surface of an electrical conductor in the form of a sphere, the surface of the sphere is then treaded by the electrical current that follow both the wave particle's defined motion and direction, thus producing an electrical field which also follow both the defined wave particle motion and direction, and also produces the magnetic field in the same direction and in the same defined wave particle motion, but, again, this area of physics would have to be re-understood or redefined, because this is not true in this case, for, when the electrical current passes through the surface of an electrical conductor in the form of a sphere, the electrical current treads its surface following both the direction and motion of defined spherical particle motion, thus producing an electrical field that treads on the surface of the sphere in a direction and motion that follow the same defined spherical particle motion, and as this happens, it produces a magnetic field that treads the surface of the sphere that follow the motion of defined spherical particle motion, but it treads the surface of the sphere in an opposite direction as for the direction the electrical field treads the surface of the sphere, and, as this happens, the gravitational field is strengthened - for each of the sphere's particles, much like all the particles within this universe of ours, have their own gravitational field, and cohesion of all cohesive particles would result a single gravitational field that always originates from its center -, coming from the center of the sphere...*
With the 'Grand Unification' theoretically at hand, it would then be possible to produce or generate seemingly unlimited electrical energy (SEEMINGLY, 'cause at least for human consumption within its, the human race's, limited existence); most important of all, to magnetize and de-magnetize all particles within this universe of ours, so as to re-establish the limitations regarding humankind's existence (how? to be discussed later), as set in the prior sentence; and to control gravitational and electromagnetic forces, in which could factually be used to curve the space-time dimension/continuum either further inwards or outwards than its original state, in order to attain travel speeds faster than that of light - ie. the distance, in terms of the space-time frame, between two certain points are measured as two light years apart (which means that it would take a particle travelling at the speed of light two Earth years to come from one point and reach the other point), and if you could curve the space-time dimension/continuum between the two said points either further inwards or outwards, the said two points, or one of the two points I have said and any point within the linear space between the two said points, can be controlled to directly face each other with no distance between them at all, or any distance for that matter - it would then only take the particle, because of such controlled platforms and the utilization of gravitational, along with the other unified, forces, 0 Earth seconds to two light years less than one light second.
(note: Einstein proposed that if travel speeds of all other particles faster than that of light particles, or of photons, were not an impossibility (it is an impossibility because as a particle increases its speed, the more massive it becomes, and the more massive a particle, the more energy would have to be used for the particle to continue moving - it thus, again, becomes more massive due to the addition of energy unto itself -, more so if it needs to be constantly accelerated in order to attain speeds faster than that of photons'... so, as the particle reaches the speed closest to that of photons, it would then have been infinitely massive - because it would have added an infinite amount of energy unto itself -, - energy is equivalent to matter, for they are the same thing, therefore, the particle would need to have an infinite amount of energy to continue on moving and accelerating so as to attain speeds faster than that of photons' or of light's - the energy within this universe is finite, and the size of this universe is finite as well, for it only SEEMS to be infinitely finite in size... this is because the size of this universe is finite at a given coordinate of the dimension of time relative to the simultaneous coordinates of all its other dimensions, but is infinite in size relative to all the particles within this universe's, therefore the entirety of this universe's, most probable 'future' coordinates, though it remains finite because energy is equivalent to matter, and the energy within this universe is finite, thus the matter within this universe is finite as well, for mass and energy is the same thing, therefore the expansion and seemingly continuous motion of this universe of ours is dependent on the matter or energy within it, which is finite, but, with this in mind, after this universe has consumed the elasticity of its space, composed of its finite energy or mass content, this universe would then stop expanding or its apparent continuous motion would have stopped by then, thus all the particles within this universe would not be prevented from falling into each other's, as well as the center of this universe's, gravitational field, and, after all such particles have fallen back to each's, as well as the center of this universe's, gravitational field, all the particles within this universe would have, by then, fallen back into the center of this universe's gravitational field, with each particle on top of all other particles within this universe, thus it would then have reverted back to its original state - a state of singularity, which has the properties of being composed of finite matter or energy as a ball of matter or energy with infinite mass and density... and, what would prevent this state of singularity, no different from that of the original state of singularity theoretically present in the pre-Big Bang scenario, from another similar explosion or another similar Big Bang? Well, it could not be prevented from doing so, thus, everything, perhaps, would happen the exact way all the events happened from the original Big Bang, then to the second and similar Big Bang, which would result in a second and similar expansion or a second similar apparent continuous motion of this universe, and would continue doing or repeating this system throughout the infinity of time, unless the platform which contains this universe of ours, therefore the platform beyond this universe's space-and-time frame/continuum:
- has a finite dimension of time;
- have finite dimensions of space;
*of which such two properties are also found in the dimensions of this universe of ours*
- and events happening on this platform which contains this universe of ours or beyond this universe's space-and-time frame/continuum affect the state of this universe's dimensions, its mass/energy content, the motion of all the particles within this universe, the events happening within this universe, and the behaviour of all the particles within this universe...;...
*but, as to how we currently perceive, based from our observations, the present state of this universe of ours, as well as the physical laws that govern this universe, this would not be the case regarding the properties of the dimensions the platform containing this universe of ours, or the platform beyond this universe's - the same universe the platform contains - dimensions of time-and-space, because, as I will further discuss later:
- this universe of ours is changing because of its time dimension, and only in time could we have change. And, in this universe of ours, inertia is only APPARENTLY, or SEEMINGLY, changeless;
- this universe of ours is both divided and finite because it has the dimensions of space, and only in space could we have gravity, which is divided, and electricity, which is finite. And,, in this universe of ours, gravity and electricity are only APPARENTLY, or SEEMINGLY, undivided and infinite, respectively;
so, the platform containing this universe would have to be beyond this universe's dimensions of space-and-time;
- thus, if the said platform would have to be beyond this universe's time dimension, it would have to be changeless;
- and, if the said platform is beyond this universe's dimensions of space, it would have to be both undivided and infinite;
- therefore, it could not, in any way, affect the universe it contains, for the changeless has no control over the changing, the undivided has no power over the divided, and the infinite has no bearing over the finite...
*note on this: this is probably the underlying concept of the first cosmological constant - that when something is created, it must have purpose, and thus, this universe of ours, along with all the particles within it, have well-planned purposes of both seemingly infinite continuity and apparently finite behaviour, governed by apparently changeless or unchanging, and seemingly definite or final, physical laws, as well as changeless or unchanging, and definite or finite, behaviour and/or motion of all the particles within this universe, or all the matter or energy that composes all the dimensions of this universe of ours... and, what exists within this universe cannot exist outside it or within the platform that contains it, for particles that only exist in the dimensions of space-and-time can never do any change, let alone exist, within a platform that is beyond this universe's space-and-time dimensions, for, again, only in time could particles within this universe, which has a dimension of time, do anything as, because of the dimension of time, it is a changing universe, and, again, neither could such particles within this universe actually exist, for only in space could we have gravity and electricity, and only in space could such particles within this universe, which has dimensions of space, actually exist as, because of the dimensions of space that produces gravity and electricity, it is a divided and finite universe, respectively*
so, otherwise, when the universe falls back into a second and similar state of singularity, as of the first state of singularity it was theoretically in or the first pre-Big Bang scenario, all the matter or energy this universe initially had during the first state of singularity would still be present upon the second or succeeding and always similar states of singularity it would be in, and the behaviour of all the particles of this universe in its second or succeeding and similar states of singularity or pre-Big Bang scenarios, as well as its behaviour after the Big Bang and in succeeding states of singularity it would be in, would always be the same relative to the first state of singularity this universe was theoretically in or the first pre-Big Bang scenario. Thus, the events that would happen within the dimensions of this universe on its second or succeeding expansions or apparent continuous motion would always be the same, for the same matter or energy is present, and the same matter or energy would behave the exact way as it did before on the same platform of all its same dimensions, in which the same platform of the same dimensions are composed of the same matter or energy...
*note on this: this is, perhaps, the underlying concept of pre-destination or pre-definition*
so, I am led to think just how many times we all, and every particle within this universe of ours, have seen and done the same things, thought the same thoughts, and been placed on the same coordinates of all this universe's dimensions, as well as how many times have we all led, or lived, the same lives...),
(And, back from where we took off:)
a particle, other than photons, having a specific critical speed faster than that of the current speed limit, which is the constant speed of light, the space between its take-off point and a full-circle destination point would actually seem to be zero( it would actually seem to be zero because of the speed it has on treading the said space between the two points), thus it would take the particle travelling at a certain critical speed faster than that of photons or light waves a 0 value of time - then the particle would have travelled full-circle of the space between the two said points of seemingly 0 value of space, at the same time consuming 0 value of time for the said trip... therefore, the particle would arrive at the destination point before taking off from its point of origin... impossible? yes, for it is an impossibility for any particle other than that of photons to attain speeds faster than that of light or of photons, so, conversely, if it were possible for any particle other than photons to attain such speeds faster than that of light or of photons, the impossibility would then have to be a possibility...)
Furthermore, with effective and efficient magnetization and demagnetization of every single particle contained within the universe theoretically at hand, what would stop one from using such scientific knowledge for technological purposes in securing oneself? One could produce perfect armory, or even perfect weapons - one could produce armory that would repel every particle it was programmed to deem as a threat to its security, and attract particles it was programmed to deem as necessary for its sustainability, and one could produce weapons that would repel every particle it chooses in its path, with such a force one well chooses... a bomb that could perhaps repel and therefore displace every particle it was programmed to repel in its path, without actually causing harm to the displaced particles? what if such a bomb was set to repel and displace an area which is protected by armory that was programmed to repel every particle it deems as a threat to its security (included, therefore, all forces, in which all known forces have actual particles)? would the counteracting forces just cancel each other out? I think so - thus, when the theoretical 'imaginary time' comes that such weapons and armory are then mass produced, wars would be nothing more than a foolish game, in which the outcome would always be deadlocks. also, when such are produced, the current scare regarding the production of anti-matter and its possible utilization as a weapon of mass destruction would then be
deemed as actually baseless, for one could easily program such theoretical armory to repel even the particles composing anti-matter, for it would be popularly known then... thus, anti-matter would only be used or utilized as a prime and efficient energy source, and nothing more (anti-matter has 40% efficiency in terms of energy production, produces no waste materials whatsoever, but, if it comes into contact with matter, it extinguishes or vaporizes itself and all the matter it came in contact with 200,000,000 times its own size or radius, while the most efficient means of producing energy at the present is nuclear fusion, which has only 6% efficiency, produces radioactive or toxic waste materials, and is 50,000,000 times less destructive than anti-matter, but still destructive nonetheless...). (CERN, the world's largest and most advanced scientific research institute located at Geneva, Switzerland, is continually producing 'usable' anti-matter - with the use of the largest particle-accelerator-and-collidrant ever built, in which two photons (particles which light waves are composed of) are accelerated to speeds minutely faster than the speed of light on opposite directions, then collided with each other to produce a physical phenomena known as the 'singularity', a physical state of matter and energy with the properties of infinite mass and infinite densities, theoretically present only at the 'pre-Big Bang scenario', in which the process produces matter and energy (anti-matter included) seemingly or apparently not present beforehand - out of only the materials present, which is an impossibility based on the current physical laws which operate and govern the present state of the universe (conservation of mass and energy, etc.).
*note on this: matter and energy in a state of singularity would not have the same internal physical laws as those that govern and bound our universe, therefore we have no way of knowing the internal state of matter and energy in a state of singularity...*
for the sci-fi lovers: with such theoretical knowledge at hand, one could assume that if one has devised a plan in which to reach the center of the universe (not necessarily the center of the universe, for a specific area would be enough, but, for now, the center of the universe would be used so as to effectively and efficiently convey or make a point in a creative manner of delivery), with equipment to map all surrounding particles from the said center (future developments on present computer systems fused with future developments on present satellite technologies would produce such an equipment, much easier or sooner if just to be used on all particles within a specific area such as a portion on the surface of the Earth, and not all the surrounding particles from the center of the universe), and another equipment powerful enough to either magnetize and demagnetize all such surrounding particles back to their certain prior positions or to their most probable 'future' positions (the production or development of such an equipment would, again, be easier or sooner if only to be used on all the particles within a specific area such as a portion on the surface of the Earth, and not on all the surrounding particles from the center of the universe), this person would have total control over the universe's space-time dimension/continuum.
ie. the travel time it would take from this point of the universe to its center is approximated to be 800,000,000 Earth years, and if a person with equipment powerful enough to map, then either magnetize or demagnetize, all surrounding particles from the said center of the universe, devised a scheme in which to survive the two-way trip (approximately 1,600,000,000 Earth years) in which the person either uses his magnetizing-and-de-magnetizing equipment on him while travelling so as to freeze the particles of his body and all surrounding particles from his body at a critical radius, therefore putting a halt to the person's natural ageing process and need for sustenance, or even a scheme in which the person utilizes the control of the unified physical forces to curve the space-time frame between this point to the center of the universe either further inwards or outwards to lessen the travel time... so, assuming he (survives the trip) reaches the center of the universe in exactly 100 Earth years, magnetizes all surrounding particles from the center back to their prior positions exactly 200 Earth years and an Earth day, then after doing so commences on his trip back to the other point, which takes him exactly 100 Earth years to do so, he would therefore arrive exactly a day earlier, in terms of events within the space-time dimension/continuum and not on most people's current concept of 'imaginary time', wouldn't he?
*now my question, or rather questions, are: would he see himself planning on his trip and doing what he did at that 'imaginary time'? No, he would not - his particles, along with every particle he brought with him to the center of the universe, were not reversed or placed back to their prior positions... would everything, every event, be exactly what it was at that point in 'imaginary time'? No, it would not - for the particles he brought with him to the center of the universe prior to the reversal of all surrounding particles from the center affect either the reversal or the fast-tracking of all the surrounding particles from the center again either to place them to their prior or 'future' positions, and, of course, the person needs to have first a map of all the prior positions of all such particles within the time-space-frame (the event-frame would be more precise...) the person wants to place either back or fast-track to their prior and 'future' positions, respectively, so as for the events would be just as what they were, or closest to what they would be - at a certain level that would not be 100% accurate, only closest to the accuracy rate of 100% (otherwise, the events would be in no way even remotely similar, or close, to the prior and 'future' events, respectively), then such controlled reversals and, more so, fast-tracking would be nothing more than alternate 'past and future time-streams' ('past and future event-streams would be more precise)... so this would also hold true in fast-tracking processes.
*note on the above paragraph, and most of the prior paragraphs: when this theoretical 'imaginary' time comes, it would be the end of development in any form other than spiritual/metaphysical and morality-based, knowledge-seeking in any form other than spiritual/metaphysical and morality-based, and philosophy in any form other than spiritual/metaphysical and morality-based... and this is, perhaps, the underlying concept of the attainment of the highest level of consciousness*
and, as an afterthought, i'm afraid the scientific breakthroughs of the 20th century up to present scientific breakthroughs have not yet reached yet most educational institutions, specially in less-developed countries, specifically the tertiary level in technological fields of specialization (ie. engineering, systems design and programming, etc.) in terms of current curriculum standards - most of these institutions do not yet require substantial knowledge on non-Euclidean geometry, and only require the knowledge on the now debunk Euclidean geometry - it is of utmost importance that our engineers and every other technologist, to have a working and functional knowledge of non-Euclidean geometry - for these people are the ones designated by the government to assess the construction of our homes, office buildings, public structures, energy (along with other resources) distribution and production, machinery design and production, computer systems design and production, telecommunications, information dissemination, etc. If they still use Euclidean geometry in all these, i'm afraid it would defeat their role as technologists - that is, to increase efficiency and effectivity of such scientific knowledge to alleviate present human conditions... it is now known in, at least in the scientific world, that the application of geometry for human utilization, therefore its technological counterparts, should always be that of non-Euclidean geometry, and not the now debunk Euclidean geometry - case in point - it is known that we are operating on a platform (within the universe) that is five-dimensional, namely length;width;height;the curvature of space in which these three prior dimensions/coordinates operate; and time (we just cannot have a dimension of space without a dimension of time, and neither can we have gravity without curving the space around it)... Euclidean geometry deals with, yes, three dimensional structures, but the said structure is contained within a flat two-dimensional surface: a three-dimensional structure within a two-dimensional platform - non-Euclidean geometry deals with five-dimensional structures within a five-dimensional platform... it is now known, at least, again, in the scientific world, that, because of the five-dimensional nature of the universe, specifically, when talking about technological utilization of such scientific knowledge, that when operating on the Earth's surface, Euclidean laws are ineffective and inefficient compared to non-Euclidean laws regarding its technological utilization - ie. one can now have a triangle with three right angles, all because of the five-dimensional nature of the platform one would be operating on (the construction of structures on the Earth's surface, etc.) - Euclidean geometric laws operate on a two dimensional platform (say such geometric laws are even ready to operate on the third dimension), and the said platform does not actually exist, so why use Euclidean geometric laws in: the construction of structures; produce energy and plan its distribution; produce telecommunication schemes; mechanical planning of all machineries; etc., when such things I have stated are actually found and actually operate on a five-dimensional platform, aside from the fact that such things are five-dimensional in nature?
I have spent a lot of time on both the concept of time I have stated earlier and most people's current or present concept of time, and, probably, because of some hopefully substantial concepts I have come up with and read, we can now probably have two definitions of most people's current or present concept of time and one that would give us a universal standard in which to measure time. The first definition of our present concept of time, not to be viewed as time to be imaginary or time and space being of the same coin, as what I have stated earlier because I am expounding on our CURRENT or PRESENT concept of time, and not on the concept of time I have stated earlier, would be:
- time is the motion in which we measure all other motions (from the physicist John Nordberg);
The second definition of time would be:
- time is the set of events observed to be seemingly happening simultaneously relative to any observer's internal events as points of reference, which would always be the events happening within himself relative to all events that are apparently simultaneously happening all around him;
and, the universal standard in which to measure time would be:
- utilizing both the fastest and most constant motion there is in this universe, which is the speed of light's particles called photons, or of light itself, as a standard motion in which to measure all other motions...
It is currently an impossibility to go faster than the speed of light, as I have discussed earlier, and gravitational force, which affects all particles in this universe, only affects light's particles' path and not its speed or velocity... thus, we could measure time in this universe of ours by using the speed of light to measure all other observable motions, ie. fractions of the speed of light to measure all observable motions, 'cause we currently use the motion of the sun to measure all other observable motions, and mechanical or even atomic clocks, based on the sun's motion, to measure all other observable motions, as a standard in measuring time, which would always have discrepancies - this is because when the motion that is being used to measure all other motions are not constant nor the fastest motion there is in this universe, its motion would greatly affect in measuring all other inconsistent motions (the rotation of the Earth on its axis, the revolution of the Earth on its orbit, as well as the motion of the solar systems and the galaxies, in relation to the universe's motion or expansion, are all inconsistent...), and the faster the motion of the sun or the clocks (which are the motions we currently use in measuring all other motions), as well as more and more distance is between an observer and the sun or a clock, and an observer and the sun or a clock are moving further and further apart from each other, the greater the discrepancies in their internal and external motions relative to all other observable motions
(ie. a clock is accelerated further and further away from an observer, who is also moving away from the clock, thus creating more and more distance or space between the clock and the observer, therefore making it longer and longer for light and sound waves, aside from all other particles in motion therefore having speed, to bridge the gap between the clock and the observer. With this, an observer moving nearer and nearer the clock would see and hear the hands and the chimes of the clock earlier than the observer moving away from the clock, and the internal motion of the clock, or the motion of the hands or the digital display of the clock, would appear to move slower and slower to the observer moving away from the clock as more and more distance is created between the said observer and the clock. Plus, the motions of both the clock and the observer slows down the internal motions of each moving body, and this is why a clock would stop if it is moving at the speed of light.
Therefore, time would then be:
- the distance or space between two particles, dependent on the moving particle's speed in treading the said distance, which the particle would need to tread at a certain critical speed in order to arrive at the destination point from its point of origin;
- a set of seemingly, relative to an observer, simultaneous events in a given area, again relative to an observer's 'internal' events (or motion) within the given area;
- measured by the positions of a particle relative to apparently (relative to the observer particle) simultaneous positions of all other particles within a given area;
- measured using the fastest and most constant motion there is in the universe, which is the speed of light or of photons, in order to have a universal standard to measure all other motions;
- and always relative to an observer: in relation to both the observable particles or events around the observer and the observer's 'internal' events or motion...
*note on this: we always see, hear and feel events after they happen, never while the said events are actually happening - for light waves, sound waves and sensations of perception in the form of electrical impulses all need to travel the space between the observer, specifically our brains (which would also need time in processing the information it recieves in the form of electrical impulses), and the events being observed...*
Upon reading, and with the substantial help of citations from, 'Einstein's Physics Of Illusion © 1980 by John Dobson', I would like to expound on the question of 'why matter and energy is massive' or 'what makes matter and energy massive',
To answer this, we must use Einstein's re-understanding of geometry and, thus, re-understanding of physics. As I have stated earlier, we now know that Euclid was wrong with his geometric laws and functions - for it operated on a platform that does not actually exist - Euclid formulated theoretical geometry about a theoretical space which does not actually exist, and Newton was wrong with his physics as well - for he based his physics from Euclid's theoretical geometry about a theoretical space which does not actually exist, thus Newton's physics was a theoretical one about a theoretical universe which does not actually exist, realized upon the re-understanding of geometry by Einstein: we now know that what we have been calling matter, mass or inertia is really just energy - it is just potential energy. Also with the re-understanding of geometry, we now know that what we have been calling rest mass, which is responsible for the heaviness of particles and their resistance to being shaken, is really just energy. Einstein explained all these concepts in his famous equation E=mc2. The mathematical concept of this equation is that for a particle seemingly at rest (remember, all particles within this universe of ours are in motion because it is an expanding, thus moving, universe), its mass is equivalent to its energy, and vice-versa. The c2 is just in case your units of space and time don't match. If you've chosen to measure space in an arbitrary unit and time in another arbitrary unit, and if you have not taken the trouble to connect the two
units, then, for your system you have to put in the c2. so, we now measure the time in years and
the distance in light-years, and the units correspond. That "c" in the equation is the speed of light in your system of units, and if you've
chosen years and light-years then the speed of light in your system is one. And if you square it, it's still one, and the equation doesn't change. The equation simply says that energy and mass are the same thing.
Then, we must choose which elemental force available in this universe of ours makes such particles massive. We must consider that what one should look for is potential energy, for particles that seem to be at rest are also hard to shake and massive. Radiation or the weak and strong nuclear forces are out of the question, for such elemental forces of energy never seem to stand still, as well as magnetic forces of energy, and kinetic energy. So, that leaves us with electrical and gravitational forces of energy. And, such answers to the questions above would then be available:
(note: as one winds up a wound-up clock, it grows more massive or heavier, and thus it gets harder to shake... the clock is wound-up or winds up against a spring inside its internal mechanism... this is because, the more we wind up a clock, the more potential energy we put into it, and potential energy, as I have stated, is the only thing that is hard to shake in this universe of ours...)
- all the particles in this universe are wound up against gravitational force:
such particles are wound up against gravitational force or the gravitational field just by being spaced away from itself against the gravitational pull inward, and it turns out to be just the right amount...;
all the particles within the universe were dispelled from the center of the universe by the advent of the Big Bang, and thus, they are moving away from the gravitational field of this universe, which originates from the center of this universe;
and, when such particles move away from each's gravitational field, as well as from the center of this universe's gravitational field, they are resisting each's want to fall back, thus making each of them massive - for as they resist falling back to each's gravitational field, as well as resist falling back to the center of this universe's gravitational field, using the initial force brought about by the advent of the Big Bang, the more energy is needed by each resisting particle to get further away from the pull of the gravitational field, thus the addition of energy upon itself is equivalent to the mass it adds upon itself, making it always massive...
- all the particles within this universe of ours is wound up against electricity:
such particles are wound up against electrical force or the electrical field just by being spaced inwards upon itself against the resistance of such particles to fall back upon each other's gravitational field or the center of this universe's gravitational field, which tries to pull all such particles upon each's gravitational field and the center of this universe's gravitational field, and it turns out to be just the right amount...;
all particles within this universe of ours push their like charges toward each other;
as particles push their two electrons toward each other they have to do work, and they get heavier or more massive as their electrons get more massive;
as particles push their two protons toward each other they get more massive as their protons get more massive;
as particles push their like charges together, their electrical charges become very small, and they become more massive;
and as all the particles within this universe of ours are spaced-out or resisting to fall back upon each's gravitational field, as well as the center of this universe's gravitational field, they become small in the electrical field, thus they are always massive...
*note on this: when a particle is spaced-out or resisting to fall back to a gravitational field, it is impossible for the particle not to become small in the electrical field, for, very much like time and space, electrical and gravitational forces are of the same coin, but represents each opposing side...*
Now, such concepts could probably answer the quesstions regarding the internal physical laws that govern a state of singularity and the platform which contains this universe of ours.
We see or perceive this universe of ours as finite, divided and changing, which means that:
first, because of space, this universe of ours is both divided and finite - for only in space could contain matter and energy;
and, because of time, this universe of ours is changing - for only in time could there be change because only in time could anything happen;
Thus, within a state of singularity and within the platform that contains this universe of ours, such platforms are beyond the physical laws that govern our universe. Therefore, such platforms are beyond space and time - such platforms are infinite, undivided and changeless...
But, within this universe of ours, do we not also perceive inertia as changeless, electricity as infinite, and gravity as undivided? Have we mistaken inertia as changeless rather than changing, electricity as infinite rather than finite, and gravity as undivided rather than divided? Yes, we have, and the mistake was done because of our misunderstanding of geometry, and it is now corrected by Einstein's equations of his 'Special and General theory of Relativity', which paved the way for non-Euclidean geometry and thus our re-understanding of physics. The mistake may have been a genetic one, for we just needed the knowledge of a 3 dimensional universe - the propagation of the human species would not have been possible in a 2 dimensional perception of the universe, but that was all that was needed for the reproduction and propagation of the human species, and nothing more.
*note on this: John Dobson, from his lecture entitled 'Einstein's Physics of Illusion', called this "apparitional causation"*
*another note on this: knowledge on higher physics tells us that all electrical particles have energy just because of their smallness, and as it gets bigger, their electrical energies would go down... so if it could become infinitely big, its electrical energy would become 0...*
With all these concepts in mind, such concepts that would explain why all the particles within this universe of ours behave in such ways, why inertia remains actually changing, why electricity remains actually finite, and why gravity remains divided would then be available:
- all the particles within this universe of ours behave in such ways because they all yearn to be in a state that they are not or they all try to go back to a state that they actually were, in the first place;
- inertia remains changing because of its yearning of being changeless in the apparently changing;
- electricity remains finite because it yearns to be infinite in the apparently finite;
- and gravity remains divided because it yearns to be undivided in the apparently divided...
references/sources:
- 'Einstein's Physics Of Illusion © 1980 by John Dobson'
- http://www.grandunification.com
*for completion in due 'imaginary time'*
- Marx Vergel Melencio
*'this paper or document was written for the sole purpose of discussing, which the author deems as having highly probable content, personal concepts regarding the subject matter, and not, in any sense, of having the purpose of discussing a concept of, or with, substantial finality, nor any other purpose for that matter... I, like all rational human beings on this planet, have brains that have its own unique way of processing information, specifically its information-filtration process, and I, just like every rational human being with the same unique properties of each's brains, am restricted, or limited, by such processes of information-filtration, which contains me to my own judgement to deem what is acceptable, or even considerable - at least to my own standards -, and dismiss, or reject, anything I deem, based on my own, much like every rational human being's own, unique process of information-filtration, unacceptable or flawed... though, as I am, again, along with every rational human being on this planet, armed with my own unique information-filtration process, I am always ready to revise, or even completely change, the information stored inside this head of mine whenever information I, again, deem as acceptable comes along... - marx*
|